{"id":27,"date":"2009-03-31T14:35:00","date_gmt":"2009-03-31T14:35:00","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/swfox.net\/blog\/2009\/03\/31\/choosing-speakers-and-sessions-harder-than-ever\/"},"modified":"2009-03-31T14:35:00","modified_gmt":"2009-03-31T14:35:00","slug":"choosing-speakers-and-sessions-harder-than-ever","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/swfox.net\/blog\/2009\/03\/choosing-speakers-and-sessions-harder-than-ever\/","title":{"rendered":"Choosing speakers and sessions: harder than ever"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>We&#8217;re deep into the speaker and session selection process and it&#8217;s harder this year than ever before. We have a record number of submissions, both of speakers and topics. What makes this really exciting is the number of submissions from &#8220;Southwest Fox virgins.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>We received proposals from 27 people, nearly twice as many as we need. About half of the 27 have never spoken at Southwest Fox before; some have previously spoken only at user groups. We&#8217;re really excited that so many people want to share what they&#8217;ve learned.<\/p>\n<p>We have proposals for 92 topics; we need 28 to 30, plus 4 pre-conference sessions. Obviously, there&#8217;s some overlap among the topics proposed by different people. However, there seems to be less of that than in previous years. That&#8217;s both good and bad. It means we don&#8217;t have to do as much of &#8220;Do we want person X to present topic Z, or would we rather that person Y do that topic?&#8221; On the other hand, this means that we have a lot more topics proposed that aren&#8217;t going to make the cut.<\/p>\n<p>The number of topics proposed per speaker ranges from 1 to 19! The median and the mode (most common) is 3. Veteran speakers know that giving us more than 2 to choose from is a good idea, and increases the chance of being chosen.<\/p>\n<p>The topics proposed are pretty well distributed among the tracks. We allowed people to designate two tracks for each topic they proposed. Not surprisingly, the most common track is &#8220;Solidifying VFP Development&#8221; with 33 submissions. We have 29 topics that fit into &#8220;Integrating VFP&#8221; and 25 each for &#8220;Extending VFP&#8221; and &#8220;Technology for VFP Developers.&#8221; We got 9 proposals for pre-conference sessions and the same number for &#8220;Taking Advantage of VFPX.&#8221; What&#8217;s amazing about those statistics is that, for four of our tracks, we have enough topics to practically fill the whole conference.<\/p>\n<p>So what does all this mean? First, that I&#8217;m really glad we gave people a VFP application to submit their proposals this year. Consolidating the submissions into our database was pretty easy. I just unzipped each submission into a separate folder and wrote a little program to loop through the folders and populate the master tables. If we&#8217;d had the usual mishmash of Word docs, with some speakers submitting a single document and others submitting one per session, I would have spent much, much longer. (And, of course, now that I have it working, the program is reusable. Maybe next year, I&#8217;ll extend it to handle processing the emails and unzipping the data.)<\/p>\n<p>For the three of us, it&#8217;s meant somewhat more time working through the proposals and making our individual selections. Interestingly, though, the amount of variance among our individual choices isn&#8217;t a lot higher than in the past. We have a conference call scheduled to resolve the differences. (Think House-Senate Joint Conference Committee.)<\/p>\n<p>For those who submitted, of course, it means more competition and that we&#8217;ll have to say &#8220;sorry, thanks, please try again&#8221; to more people than ever before.<\/p>\n<p>For our attendees, we think it means the best line-up of speakers and topics ever. We hope you&#8217;ll agree.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>We&#8217;re deep into the speaker and session selection process and it&#8217;s harder this year than ever before. We have a record number of submissions, both of speakers and topics. What makes this really exciting is the number of submissions from &#8220;Southwest Fox virgins.&#8221; We received proposals from 27 people, nearly [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[1],"tags":[23,24,27],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/swfox.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/27"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/swfox.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/swfox.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/swfox.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/swfox.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=27"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/swfox.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/27\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":86,"href":"https:\/\/swfox.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/27\/revisions\/86"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/swfox.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=27"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/swfox.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=27"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/swfox.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=27"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}